"integrated relative clause" meaning in English

{
  "forms": [
    {
      "form": "integrated relative clauses",
      "tags": [
        "plural"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "head": "integrated relative clause"
      },
      "expansion": "integrated relative clause (plural integrated relative clauses)",
      "name": "en-noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "noun",
  "senses": [
    {
      "antonyms": [
        {
          "word": "supplementary relative clause"
        },
        {
          "word": "non-restrictive relative clause"
        },
        {
          "word": "non-defining relative clause"
        }
      ],
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with 1 entry",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with entries",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "topical",
          "langcode": "en",
          "name": "Grammar",
          "orig": "en:Grammar",
          "parents": [
            "Linguistics",
            "Language",
            "Social sciences",
            "Communication",
            "Sciences",
            "Society",
            "All topics",
            "Fundamental"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "2024, Geoffrey K. Pullum, The Truth About English Grammar, Polity Press, →ISBN, pages 110-111:",
          "text": "Integrated relative clauses are crucial parts of the structures of their sentences, and couldn’t be left out without grossly changing the structure and the meaning, often making the sentence completely vacuous. (Other books call them “restrictive” or “defining” relatives – terms I don’t use, because the clauses in question don’t always restrict and don’t always define.) The most important thing to remember about them is that in writing they are not flanked by commas. Here’s an example, with the integrated relative clause in square brackets: This is the package [that I’ve been waiting for __ ].",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "A relative clause that provides information essential to describing or identifying the person or thing that is meant."
      ],
      "id": "en-integrated_relative_clause-en-noun-Df68zZod",
      "links": [
        [
          "grammar",
          "grammar"
        ],
        [
          "relative clause",
          "relative clause"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(grammar) A relative clause that provides information essential to describing or identifying the person or thing that is meant."
      ],
      "synonyms": [
        {
          "word": "restrictive relative clause"
        },
        {
          "word": "defining relative clause"
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        "grammar",
        "human-sciences",
        "linguistics",
        "sciences"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "integrated relative clause"
}

{
  "forms": [
    {
      "form": "integrated relative clauses",
      "tags": [
        "plural"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "head": "integrated relative clause"
      },
      "expansion": "integrated relative clause (plural integrated relative clauses)",
      "name": "en-noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "noun",
  "senses": [
    {
      "antonyms": [
        {
          "word": "supplementary relative clause"
        },
        {
          "word": "non-restrictive relative clause"
        },
        {
          "word": "non-defining relative clause"
        }
      ],
      "categories": [
        "English countable nouns",
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English lemmas",
        "English multiword terms",
        "English nouns",
        "English terms with quotations",
        "Pages with 1 entry",
        "Pages with entries",
        "en:Grammar"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "2024, Geoffrey K. Pullum, The Truth About English Grammar, Polity Press, →ISBN, pages 110-111:",
          "text": "Integrated relative clauses are crucial parts of the structures of their sentences, and couldn’t be left out without grossly changing the structure and the meaning, often making the sentence completely vacuous. (Other books call them “restrictive” or “defining” relatives – terms I don’t use, because the clauses in question don’t always restrict and don’t always define.) The most important thing to remember about them is that in writing they are not flanked by commas. Here’s an example, with the integrated relative clause in square brackets: This is the package [that I’ve been waiting for __ ].",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "A relative clause that provides information essential to describing or identifying the person or thing that is meant."
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "grammar",
          "grammar"
        ],
        [
          "relative clause",
          "relative clause"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(grammar) A relative clause that provides information essential to describing or identifying the person or thing that is meant."
      ],
      "synonyms": [
        {
          "word": "restrictive relative clause"
        },
        {
          "word": "defining relative clause"
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        "grammar",
        "human-sciences",
        "linguistics",
        "sciences"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "integrated relative clause"
}